From: Klaus Jensen <k.jen...@samsung.com>
Some might actually care about the return value of dma_memory_rw. So
let us pass it along instead of ignoring it.
There are no existing users of the return value, so this patch should be
safe.
Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jen...@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Keith Busch <kbu...@kernel.org>
Message-Id: <20191011070141.188713-2-...@irrelevant.dk>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>
---
include/hw/pci/pci.h | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pci.h b/include/hw/pci/pci.h
index 4ca7258b5b7..896cef9ad47 100644
--- a/include/hw/pci/pci.h
+++ b/include/hw/pci/pci.h
@@ -788,8 +788,7 @@ static inline AddressSpace *pci_get_address_space(PCIDevice
*dev)
static inline int pci_dma_rw(PCIDevice *dev, dma_addr_t addr,
void *buf, dma_addr_t len, DMADirection dir)
{
- dma_memory_rw(pci_get_address_space(dev), addr, buf, len, dir);
- return 0;
+ return dma_memory_rw(pci_get_address_space(dev), addr, buf, len, dir);
}
static inline int pci_dma_read(PCIDevice *dev, dma_addr_t addr,
--
2.26.2
