All,

Let's de-escalate this, please. There's no reason to doubt Klaus wants
to see this to work well, just as everyone else does. We unfortunately
have conflicting proposals posted, and everyone is passionate enough
about their work, but please simmer down.

As I mentioned earlier, I'd like to refocus on the basic implementation
and save the persistent state discussion once the core is solid. After
going through it all, I feel there's enough to discuss there to keep us
busy for little while longer. Additional comments on the code will be
coming from me later today.

Reply via email to