On 12/10/20 15:49, Thomas Huth wrote: >> We chose to use the same name because the new version generally is the >> one you want and, except for the handling of events, is exactly the same >> as before. In other words, I'm treating the new semantics more as a >> bugfix than a feature. >> >> The only trap that backports of later patches could fall into is if they >> want to look at events, but it would be caught easily because the test >> would fail. > Ok, thanks for the explanation! ... but I think it might be good to have > this information in the patch description, though.
Ok, I'll add a couple words. Paolo
