On Jan 18 22:09, Minwoo Im wrote: > > > Yes, CMB in v1.4 is not backward-compatible, but is it okay to move onto > > > the CMB v1.4 from v1.3 without supporting the v1.3 usage on this device > > > model? > > > > Next patch moves to v1.4. I wanted to split it because the "bump" patch > > also adds a couple of other v1.4 requires fields. But I understand that > > this is slightly wrong. > > Sorry, I meant I'd like to have CMB for v1.3 support along with the v1.4 > support in this device model separately. Maybe I missed the linux-nvme > mailing list for CMB v1.4, but is there no plan to keep supportin CMB > v1.3 in NVMe driver?
I posted a patch on linux-nvme for v1.4 support in the kernel. It will support both the v1.3 and v1.4 behavior :)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
