On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 03:44:49PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 18/01/2021 14.37, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021, at 6:11 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 02:38:08PM +0800, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
> > > > We only run build test and check-acceptance as their are too many
> > > > failures in checks due to minor string mismatch.
> > > 
> > > Can you give real examples of what's broken here, as that sounds
> > > rather suspicious, and I'm not convinced it should be ignored.
> > 
> > Mostly Input/Output error vs I/O Error.
> 
> Right, out of curiosity, I also gave it a try:
> 
>  https://gitlab.com/huth/qemu/-/jobs/969225330
> 
> Apart from the "I/O Error" vs. "Input/Output Error" difference, there also
> seems to be a problem with "sed" in some of the tests.

The "sed" thing sounds like something that ought to be investigated
from a portability POV rather than ignored.

More worrying is the fact that there's a segv in there too when
running qemu-img, which does not give me confidence in use of
it with musl.



Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|


Reply via email to