On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 03:44:49PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 18/01/2021 14.37, Jiaxun Yang wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021, at 6:11 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 02:38:08PM +0800, Jiaxun Yang wrote: > > > > We only run build test and check-acceptance as their are too many > > > > failures in checks due to minor string mismatch. > > > > > > Can you give real examples of what's broken here, as that sounds > > > rather suspicious, and I'm not convinced it should be ignored. > > > > Mostly Input/Output error vs I/O Error. > > Right, out of curiosity, I also gave it a try: > > https://gitlab.com/huth/qemu/-/jobs/969225330 > > Apart from the "I/O Error" vs. "Input/Output Error" difference, there also > seems to be a problem with "sed" in some of the tests.
The "sed" thing sounds like something that ought to be investigated from a portability POV rather than ignored. More worrying is the fact that there's a segv in there too when running qemu-img, which does not give me confidence in use of it with musl. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|