On Jan 19 12:21, Minwoo Im wrote: > On 21-01-18 22:14:45, Klaus Jensen wrote: > > On Jan 17 23:53, Minwoo Im wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > This patch series introduces NVMe subsystem device to support multi-path > > > I/O in NVMe device model. Two use-cases are supported along with this > > > patch: Multi-controller, Namespace Sharing. > > > > > > V1 RFC has been discussed with Klaus and Keith, I really appreciate them > > > for this patch series to have proper direction [1]. > > > > > > This patch series contains few start-up refactoring pathces from the > > > first to fifth patches to make nvme-ns device not to rely on the nvme > > > controller always. Because nvme-ns shall be able to be mapped to the > > > subsystem level, not a single controller level so that it should provide > > > generic initialization code: nvme_ns_setup() with NvmeCtrl. To do that, > > > the first five patches are to remove the NvmeCtrl * instance argument > > > from the nvme_ns_setup(). I'd be happy if they are picked! > > > > > > For controller and namespace devices, 'subsys' property has been > > > introduced to map them to a subsystem. If multi-controller needed, we > > > can specify 'subsys' to controllers the same. > > > > > > For namespace deivice, if 'subsys' is not given just like it was, it > > > will have to be provided with 'bus' parameter to specify a nvme > > > controller device to attach, it means, they are mutual-exlusive. To > > > share a namespace between or among controllers, then nvme-ns should have > > > 'subsys' property to a single nvme subsystem instance. To make a > > > namespace private one, then we need to specify 'bus' property rather > > > than the 'subsys'. > > > > > > Of course, this series does not require any updates for the run command > > > for the previos users. > > > > > > Plase refer the following example with nvme-cli output: > > > > > > QEMU Run: > > > -device nvme-subsys,id=subsys0 \ > > > -device nvme,serial=foo,id=nvme0,subsys=subsys0 \ > > > -device nvme,serial=bar,id=nvme1,subsys=subsys0 \ > > > -device nvme,serial=baz,id=nvme2,subsys=subsys0 \ > > > -device nvme-ns,id=ns1,drive=drv10,nsid=1,subsys=subsys0 \ > > > -device nvme-ns,id=ns2,drive=drv11,nsid=2,bus=nvme2 \ > > > \ > > > -device nvme,serial=qux,id=nvme3 \ > > > -device nvme-ns,id=ns3,drive=drv12,nsid=3,bus=nvme3 > > > > > > nvme-cli: > > > root@vm:~/work# nvme list -v > > > NVM Express Subsystems > > > > > > Subsystem Subsystem-NQN > > > Controllers > > > ---------------- > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > ---------------- > > > nvme-subsys1 nqn.2019-08.org.qemu:subsys0 > > > nvme0, nvme1, nvme2 > > > nvme-subsys3 nqn.2019-08.org.qemu:qux > > > nvme3 > > > > > > NVM Express Controllers > > > > > > Device SN MN > > > FR TxPort Address Subsystem Namespaces > > > -------- -------------------- ---------------------------------------- > > > -------- ------ -------------- ------------ ---------------- > > > nvme0 foo QEMU NVMe Ctrl > > > 1.0 pcie 0000:00:06.0 nvme-subsys1 nvme1n1 > > > nvme1 bar QEMU NVMe Ctrl > > > 1.0 pcie 0000:00:07.0 nvme-subsys1 nvme1n1 > > > nvme2 baz QEMU NVMe Ctrl > > > 1.0 pcie 0000:00:08.0 nvme-subsys1 nvme1n1, nvme1n2 > > > nvme3 qux QEMU NVMe Ctrl > > > 1.0 pcie 0000:00:09.0 nvme-subsys3 > > > > > > NVM Express Namespaces > > > > > > Device NSID Usage Format > > > Controllers > > > ------------ -------- -------------------------- ---------------- > > > ---------------- > > > nvme1n1 1 134.22 MB / 134.22 MB 512 B + 0 B > > > nvme0, nvme1, nvme2 > > > nvme1n2 2 268.44 MB / 268.44 MB 512 B + 0 B nvme2 > > > nvme3n1 3 268.44 MB / 268.44 MB 512 B + 0 B nvme3 > > > > > > Summary: > > > - Refactored nvme-ns device not to rely on controller during the > > > setup. [1/11 - 5/11] > > > - Introduced a nvme-subsys device model. [6/11] > > > - Create subsystem NQN based on subsystem. [7/11] > > > - Introduced multi-controller model. [8/11 - 9/11] > > > - Updated namespace sharing scheme to be based on nvme-subsys > > > hierarchy. [10/11 - 11/11] > > > > > > Since RFC V1: > > > - Updated namespace sharing scheme to be based on nvme-subsys > > > hierarchy. > > > > > > > Great stuff Minwoo. Thanks! > > > > I'll pick up [01-05/11] directly since they are pretty trivial. > > Thanks! will prepare the next series based on there. > > > The subsystem model looks pretty much like it should, I don't have a lot > > of comments. > > > > One thing that I considered, is if we should reverse the "registration" > > and think about it as namespace attachment. The spec is about > > controllers attaching to namespaces, not the other way around. > > Basically, let the namespaces be configured first and register on the > > subsystem (accumulating in a "namespaces" array), then have the > > controllers register with the subsystem and attach to all "non-detached" > > namespaces. This allows detached namespaces to "linger" in the subsystem > > to be attached later on. If there are any private namespaces (like ns2 > > in your example above), it will be defined after the controller with the > > bus=ctrlX parameter like normal. > > Revisited spec. again. 5.19 says "The Namespace Attachment command is > used to attach and detach controllers from a namespace.". and 5.20 says > "Host software uses the Namespace Attachment command to attach or detach > a namespace to or from a controller. The create operation does not attach > the namespace to a controller." >
Yeah ok, that is pretty inconsistent. > -device nvme-subsys,id=subsys0 > -device nvme-ns,id=ns1,drive=<drv>,nsid=1,subsys=subsys0 > -device nvme,id=nvme0,serial=foo,subsys=subsys0 > > In this case, the 'nvme0' controller will have no namespace at the > initial time of the boot-up. 'nvme0' can be attached to the namespace > 'ns1' with namespace attach command. 'nvme-ns' device is same as the > 'create-ns' operation in a NVMe subsystem. This makes sense as spec > 5.19 says "from a namespace". > > -device nvme,id=nvme1,serial=bar,subsys=subsys0b > -device nvme-ns,id=ns2,drive=<drv>,nsid=1,bus=nvme1 > > This case if for private namespace directly attached to controller. > This makes sense as spec 5.20 says "to or from a controller". > > All looks fine to me, but one thing I an wondering is that how can we > attach a controller to shared namespace(s) at the initial time? > Ok, nevermind. I think we can get 'detached' functionality in either case, so no need to increase complexity by requiring a change of define order. Supporting CNS 0x12 and 0x13 (Identify, Controller List), we need the controllers registered and stored in the subsystem anyway. So, can we add a 'namespaces' array on the subsystem to keep a list of namespaces and add a 'detached' parameter on the nvme-ns device? If that parameter is given, the device is not registered with the controllers.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature