On Wednesday, 2021-03-10 at 18:05:21 +01, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> There is only one call to pflash_register_memory() with
> rom_mode == false. As we want to modify pflash_register_memory()
> in the next patch, open-code this trivial function in place for
> the 'rom_mode == false' case.
>
> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Edmondson <david.edmond...@oracle.com>
> ---
> hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c b/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c
> index 0eb868ecd3d..897b7333222 100644
> --- a/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c
> +++ b/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c
> @@ -467,8 +467,10 @@ static void pflash_write(void *opaque, hwaddr offset,
> uint64_t value,
> switch (pfl->wcycle) {
> case 0:
> /* Set the device in I/O access mode if required */
> - if (pfl->rom_mode)
> - pflash_register_memory(pfl, 0);
> + if (pfl->rom_mode) {
> + pfl->rom_mode = false;
> + memory_region_rom_device_set_romd(&pfl->orig_mem, false);
> + }
> pfl->read_counter = 0;
> /* We're in read mode */
> check_unlock0:
> --
> 2.26.2
dme.
--
And you're standing here beside me, I love the passing of time.
