21.05.2021 18:02, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 20/05/21 17:34, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:

By adding acquire/release pairs, we ensure that .ret and .error_is_read
fields are written by block_copy_dirty_clusters before .finished is true.

As I already said, please, can we live with one mutex for now? finished, ret, 
error_is_read, all these variables are changing rarely. I doubt that 
performance is improved by these atomic operations. But complexity of the 
architecture increases exponentially.

The problem is that these are used outside coroutines. load-acquire/store-release is the 
simplest way to handle a "finished" flag really.


Related, maybe we can support CoMutex outside of coroutine context?

Create a coroutine, which will lock the mutex and unlock it for us... Or 
something like this.. It will help the task of making everything thread-safe a 
lot


--
Best regards,
Vladimir

Reply via email to