On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 06:58:09PM +0200, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
> diff --git a/job.c b/job.c
> index 872bbebb01..96fb8e9730 100644
> --- a/job.c
> +++ b/job.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,10 @@
>  #include "trace/trace-root.h"
>  #include "qapi/qapi-events-job.h"
>  
> +/* job_mutex protexts the jobs list, but also the job operations. */
> +static QemuMutex job_mutex;

It's unclear what protecting "job operations" means. I would prefer a
fine-grained per-job lock that protects the job's fields instead of a
global lock with an unclear scope.

> +
> +/* Protected by job_mutex */
>  static QLIST_HEAD(, Job) jobs = QLIST_HEAD_INITIALIZER(jobs);
>  
>  /* Job State Transition Table */
> @@ -64,27 +68,22 @@ bool JobVerbTable[JOB_VERB__MAX][JOB_STATUS__MAX] = {
>  /* Transactional group of jobs */
>  struct JobTxn {
>  
> -    /* Is this txn being cancelled? */
> +    /* Is this txn being cancelled? Atomic.*/
>      bool aborting;

The comment says atomic but this field is not accessed using atomic
operations (at least at this point in the patch series)?

>  
> -    /* List of jobs */
> +    /* List of jobs. Protected by job_mutex. */
>      QLIST_HEAD(, Job) jobs;
>  
> -    /* Reference count */
> +    /* Reference count. Atomic. */
>      int refcnt;

Same.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to