Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: > On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 at 13:34, Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> writes: >> >> > On 03/11/2021 09.41, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> >> Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: >> >> >> >>> Does it make sense for a device/board to do drive_get_next(IF_NONE) ? >> >> Short answer: hell, no! ;) >> > >> > Would it make sense to add an "assert(type != IF_NONE)" to drive_get() >> > to avoid such mistakes in the future? >> >> Worth a try. > > You need to fix the sifive_u_otp device first :-)
And for that, we may want Hao Wu's "[PATCH v4 5/7] blockdev: Add a new IF type IF_OTHER" first.
