Am 15.12.2021 um 10:19 hat Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito geschrieben: > > > On 14/12/2021 15:35, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > Am 30.11.2021 um 10:46 hat Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito geschrieben: > > > drive_add is only used in softmmu/vl.c, so it can be a static > > > function there, and drive_def is only a particular use case of > > > qemu_opts_parse_noisily, so it can be inlined. > > > > > > Also remove drive_mark_claimed_by_board, as it is only defined > > > but not implemented (nor used) anywhere. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eespo...@redhat.com> > > > > I don't think moving drive_add() actually improves anything. Yes, you > > can make it static, but in order to do that you had to introduce > > block_if_name() as a new public function and you're moving an obviously > > block related function to common code in vl.c. > > > > So this part doesn't look like a net win to me. The rest of the series > > looks good to me. > > > > So are we going to drop patch 2 and 3? For me it is fine either way, and I > saw Stefan added r-b to all patches. > > If we are, Kevin are you going to apply only patch 1 and 4, or do you want > me to send v3?
This patch does a bit more than just moving drive_add(). It also inlines drive_def() and deletes drive_mark_claimed_by_board(), which are both things that make sense to me. So this suggests a v3. But if you think I should just apply patches 1 and 4, I'm happy to do that, too. Kevin