On 20/04/2022 15.26, marcandre.lur...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com>
---
  tests/qtest/fdc-test.c    | 2 +-
  util/coroutine-ucontext.c | 2 +-
  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/qtest/fdc-test.c b/tests/qtest/fdc-test.c
index 4aa72f36431f..0b3c2c0d523f 100644
--- a/tests/qtest/fdc-test.c
+++ b/tests/qtest/fdc-test.c
@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ static void fuzz_registers(void)
static bool qtest_check_clang_sanitizer(void)
  {
-#if defined(__SANITIZE_ADDRESS__) || __has_feature(address_sanitizer)
+#ifdef QEMU_SANITIZE_ADDRESS
      return true;
  #else
      g_test_skip("QEMU not configured using --enable-sanitizers");
diff --git a/util/coroutine-ucontext.c b/util/coroutine-ucontext.c
index 904b375192ca..52725f5344fb 100644
--- a/util/coroutine-ucontext.c
+++ b/util/coroutine-ucontext.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
  #include <valgrind/valgrind.h>
  #endif
-#if defined(__SANITIZE_ADDRESS__) || __has_feature(address_sanitizer)
+#ifdef QEMU_SANITIZE_THREAD

Shouldn't that be QEMU_SANITIZE_ADDRESS instead?

 Thomas



Reply via email to