Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> writes:

> Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 09:37:37AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
>>> Perfectly aligned things look pretty, but keeping them that
>>> way as the schema evolves requires churn, and in some cases
>>> newly-added lines are not aligned properly.
>>> 
>>> Overall, trying to align things is just not worth the trouble.
>>
>> I'm in favor of commiting 7+8 squashed as a single patch.  7 alone is
>> indeed a churn magnet, so I'm either for stopping the series at 6, or
>> going all the way to 8 via a single additional step.
>
> Understood.
>
> Diffstat for 7+8:
>
>  qapi/block-core.json | 53 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>  qapi/block.json      |  6 +++---
>  qapi/char.json       |  6 +++---
>  qapi/control.json    | 10 +++++-----
>  qapi/crypto.json     | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  qapi/migration.json  |  8 ++++----
>  qapi/sockets.json    |  4 ++--
>  qapi/ui.json         | 17 ++++++++---------
>  8 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
>
> Considering we have >16k comment lines in qapi/*json, the churn feels
> quite tolerable.
>
>> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
>
> Last call for objections: Kevin, Hanna, Gerd?

The two patches squashed together:

Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>


Reply via email to