On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 9:49 AM Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > Callers of coroutine_fn must be coroutine_fn themselves, or the call > must be within "if (qemu_in_coroutine())". Apply coroutine_fn to > functions where this holds. > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> > --- > block.c | 6 +++--- > block/block-backend.c | 10 +++++----- > block/io.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- > 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/block.c b/block.c > index bc85f46eed..5c34ada53f 100644 > --- a/block.c > +++ b/block.c > @@ -631,9 +631,9 @@ static int64_t create_file_fallback_truncate(BlockBackend > *blk, > * Helper function for bdrv_create_file_fallback(): Zero the first > * sector to remove any potentially pre-existing image header. > */ > -static int create_file_fallback_zero_first_sector(BlockBackend *blk, > - int64_t current_size, > - Error **errp) > +static int coroutine_fn create_file_fallback_zero_first_sector(BlockBackend > *blk, > + int64_t > current_size, > + Error **errp)
Why mark this coroutine_fn? Maybe the intention was to also replace the call to blk_pwrite_zeroes() with blk_co_pwrite_zeroes()? Regardless: Reviewed-by: Alberto Faria <afa...@redhat.com>
