On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 12:08:12 +0100
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.came...@huawei.com> wrote:
> Rather than relying on PCI internals, use the new acpi_property
> to obtain the ACPI _UID values. These are still the same
> as the PCI Bus numbers so no functional change.
>
> Suggested-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.hu...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.came...@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com>
> ---
> v5: Leave the device naming as using bus_num so that we can
> relax assumption of the UID being only 8 bits (it is but
> we don't need to assume that)
> ---
> hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> index ee92783836..2eaa4c9203 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> @@ -1550,6 +1550,7 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
> QLIST_FOREACH(bus, &bus->child, sibling) {
> uint8_t bus_num = pci_bus_num(bus);
> uint8_t numa_node = pci_bus_numa_node(bus);
> + uint32_t uid;
>
> /* look only for expander root buses */
> if (!pci_bus_is_root(bus)) {
> @@ -1560,6 +1561,8 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
> root_bus_limit = bus_num - 1;
> }
>
> + uid = object_property_get_uint(OBJECT(bus), "acpi_uid",
> + &error_fatal);
> scope = aml_scope("\\_SB");
>
> if (pci_bus_is_cxl(bus)) {
> @@ -1567,7 +1570,7 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
> } else {
> dev = aml_device("PC%.02X", bus_num);
> }
> - aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_UID", aml_int(bus_num)));
> + aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_UID", aml_int(uid)));
> aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_BBN", aml_int(bus_num)));
> if (pci_bus_is_cxl(bus)) {
> struct Aml *aml_pkg = aml_package(2);
