I am using QEMU (not KQemu) on AMD64 and I would gladly test KQemu on my
computer.
If you (Fabrice) could build KQemu for AMD64, I will inform you of any
success or failure I experience. In the meantime, I'd suggest you provide a
proper error message for users trying to build QEMU with KQemu support,
since it is just not supported.
Cheers,

Rudi


Jason Gress wrote:

> As I have been messing around with KQemu, I have really liked the
> performance
> gain.  I even tried a 2D-only game, and it worked quite well!  The major
> performance problem I saw was mostly graphics related from what I can see.
> You can see each frame update; I am sure with a faster graphics
> engine/driver that mapped to a fast display protocol (OpenGL?) it would be
> a lot better. That, or my ATI's 2D performance with SDL is a lot slower
> than I thought.
> Thoughts?  ;)  Sound has also improved a lot, so kudos there as well!
> 
> One thing I am wondering is if/when AMD64 or other hosts will get to see
> these
> improvements.  I understand that PPC would of course only KQemu on a PPC
> client, but what about AMD64?  Will i386 (or x86_64) clients be able to
> see
> these improvements, or will the kernel module not compile at this time?  I
> don't have access to an AMD64 system right now, or I'd give it a shot.  I
> am curious, as I have a friend with an AMD64, and I'd like to get one
> sometime
> this year.  Of course, hopefully Fabrice gets a job ;) and we can all play
> with a completely open source version of KQemu by then! :)
> 
> Jason




_______________________________________________
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel

Reply via email to