On 5/19/05, Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think GNU lightning really gains us much. We'd still have to do the > hard bits (optimization, register allocation, assigning stack slots, etc). > The actual native code generation (which is what lightning gives you) is only > a few hundred lines of code.
I have the feeling that will apply to most alternatives. The problem is to turn the C code into machine code, right? That is a difficult problem, which is why a C compiler is a complex piece of software. Using a different tool is not going to turn it into a simple problem. So I think gcc is still the best bet. If the issue with the return point is the only problem, there should be several possible solution (with different performance impact). Thomas _______________________________________________ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
