Well, it turns out I am totally confused. I checked online and -- lo and behold -- the kqemu tar is just an elf binary.... :-(

I stand corrected (by myself)

JP

On 31 May 2005, at 00:00, John Davidorff Pell wrote:

Is kQemu closed source? I thought it was just not a GPL compatible license. Don't you have to build it with your qemu tree??

If you get the source code from a freely downloadable archive, then its most certainly not closed source...

Or maybe I'm totally confused and kQemu is binary-only. :-)

JP

On 26 May 2005, at 09:58, Paul Brook wrote:


(b) kqemu is a closed-source binary released under a proprietary licence, so
wouldn't be usable in a GPL project.




----
It's all fun and games 'til someone writes to a NULL pointer!


_______________________________________________
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel




--
if (message.signature==FUNNY) steal(message.signature); else message=message->next;


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel

Reply via email to