Henrik Nordstrom a écrit :
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
You point the real question: why it has been impossible to get
accepted any patch that fixed this. I has proposed one myself and I
get no comment at all. I see similar effort from others and obviousely
there failed almost the same way. No getting any valuable comment
about why a idea proposed by many peopoles is not applyed make this
subject very hard.
I think it is in part due to the command line parsing of network
parameters being all crap and need to be replaced by something more sane.
Ok. So if the command line parsing of network parameters is crap for
someone, he is free to improve it. But, sorry, I found that not a valid
excuse to silently reject others featurs to the network setup. I will be
very happy to modify the patch I propose to be compliant with a new
network parameters parsing code.
I hope that we can resolve this subject, because in my point of view,
using a existing "tun" is far more simpler than create one the way
quemu do
I agree that persistent tun tap devices is much easier to work with.
Thanks. :-)
--
Jean-Christian de Rivaz
_______________________________________________
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
