Tuesday, May 16, 2006 7:23 PM Christian MICHON wrote: >On 5/16/06, Kazu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It is normal that 2.4 kernel boots faster than 2.6 kernel, isn't it? I don't >> know why Solaris x86 10 doesn't work.
>solaris works, it's just painfully slow. >lots of time is wasted in ide-probing inside 2.6.x, because of the >way time is measured in the qemu guest. >Maybe recompiling 2.6.x guest kernel, telling it which internal timer to >use would be better. Does anyone know how to do this or tried it already? Fedora Core 3 doesn't boot in 0.8.0 binary. But it boots almost the same speed in 0.8.1 binary as on Linux host. I measured FC3 booting time without kqemu. On WinXP host: 0.8.0 binary can't boot. 0.8.1 binary 4min 15sec On Linux host: 0.8.0 4min 15sec 0.8.1 4min 5sec I measured Knoppix v3.8 booting time. On WinXP host: fb800x600 desktop=icewm 0.8.0 5min 54sec 0.8.1 3min 4sec >From Knoppix booting, I think time for scanning hardware is improved as on Linux host. I think the problem is not related to measuring time. Regards, Kazu _______________________________________________ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel