Good point on that, BUT it's not just about the GUI. It's about an
"easy" way to install the product and run a given app without the need
to create/setup a VM - To me that is the benefit of the VMware player.
However, not much of a big benefit IF QEMU is made easy to install and
has a nice GUI along with it - IMO.
Joe
Ben Pfaff wrote:
Julian Seward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Thursday 15 June 2006 14:18, WaxDragon wrote:
On 6/15/06, kadil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 18:10 +0200, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
Real world, gui's are just so easy & desirable, especially if the gui is
consistent across os's, and part of the original distro. I think
take-up would be huge (well huge-er, current takeup is huge)
Some of us appriciate the fact that qemu has no "GUI" per se. ;0)
Sure. But to 'sell' the project to wider audience, which may be
helpful for its longer term development, a GUI is necessary.
For what it's worth, VMware Player doesn't have much of a GUI.
It has about five menu items, a couple of buttons, and maybe one
dialog box.
_______________________________________________
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
