Ben Taylor wrote: >---- Martin Bochnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Ben Taylor wrote: >> >> >> >>>As Martin indicated, setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH may get you a running >>>binary, but LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong answer for Solaris. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>My answer had been a bit longer: >> >>"Read ld.so.1(1) >>i.e. >># man ld.so.1 >> >>Then: *One* option is to set $LD_LIBRARY_PATH (or potentially >>$LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 [not required])." >> >> > >I'm not saying it doesn't work. But properly compiled programs for >Solaris include the run time paths to the libraries so an LD_LIBRARY_PATH >environment variable is not required. > >LD_LIBRARY_PATH is interesting to test out new versions of support >libraries without actually having to recompile, so it has it's uses. >but too often, folks use LD_LIBRARY_PATH as a panacea on Solaris >to fix poorly compiled programs. > >Ben > >
He is experimenting and trying out a bit. Not building to be published packages. I advised him to read and understand ld.so.1(1). And I mentioned $LD_LIBRARY_PATH as *one* possible option for him to get quick results. _______________________________________________ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
