On Sat, 2006-12-16 at 23:37 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Yeah, I said "I think" because I wanted to use a decent benchmark to > actually test the results. I threw in a test against VMPlayer as well. I > found that with USB tablet emulation, Qemu was approximately only half as > fast as it could operate without it. I did NOT perform these tests > without KQEMU for two reasons 1) the *concept* that USB tablet emulation > slows down Qemu can be shown either way and 2) I can't stand waiting > around for hours and hours while Qemu translates code, sorry. At this > particular time, I'm really only interested in this particular case > because I use it for production use and many non-developer users are > wanting to do the same thing. The only major difference that I found > between Qemu+KQEMU and VMPlayer was that VMPlayer is about 4x faster when > it comes to memory access. You can view my results at: > > http://www.calcmaster.net/qemu/benchmarks-20061216/
Two things: 1. http://www.vmware.com/download/eula/player.html (Restrictions - Section 3.3 - "You may use the Software to ...") 2. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2006-07/msg00360.html _______________________________________________ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
