I think a more complete patch is needed to fully correct the problem.
Regards,
Fabrice.
jerome Arbez-Gindre wrote:
On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 14:56 +0100, jerome Arbez-Gindre wrote:
On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 17:34 +0100, jerome Arbez-Gindre wrote:
Hi,
by a call to qemu_set_fd_handler(fd,NULL,NULL,NULL) in the fd_read
callback, I have generated a "Segmentation fault" in vl.c.
My solution is not very smart... but it is very simple.
I reply to myself because I did not sleep last night:
Here is the fix without the double IOHandlerRecord list iteration.
Here is a little fix to handle the case when a IOHandler removes an
other IOHandler.
--- vl.c.mine 2007-01-11 15:06:47.000000000 +0100
+++ vl.c 2007-01-11 15:27:27.000000000 +0100
@@ -5912,11 +5912,13 @@
pioh = &first_io_handler ;
for(ioh = first_io_handler; ioh != NULL; ioh = ioh_next) {
ioh_next = ioh->next;
- if (FD_ISSET(ioh->fd, &rfds)) {
+ /* ioh->fd_read could have been set to null by an other
+ IOHandlerRecord callback */
+ if (ioh->fd_read && FD_ISSET(ioh->fd, &rfds)) {
ioh->fd_read(ioh->opaque);
}
/* ioh->fd_write could have been set to null */
- if ((ioh->fd_write) && (FD_ISSET(ioh->fd, &wfds))) {
+ if (ioh->fd_write && FD_ISSET(ioh->fd, &wfds)) {
ioh->fd_write(ioh->opaque);
}
/* the ioh could have been supressed */
_______________________________________________
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
_______________________________________________
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
