sorry I meant " :) " it's a stupid typo mistake...
basically: video is faster, hdd access is faster. I'll see if I can gather more figures. I hope too we can put these improvements back inside qemu of course! :) On 1/16/07, Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 08:25, Christian MICHON wrote: > based on *quick* benchs and without entering too much in detail > (in case I'd violate EULA), it seems faster than qemu+kqemu on > windows hosts :( Why is that a bad thing? VirtualBox is GPL, kqemu is not, so I'd say VirtualBox being faster is a good thing. It means there's no need for proprietary kernel modules. Paul
-- Christian _______________________________________________ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
