On Thursday 15 March 2007 14:53, Paul Brook wrote: > > Subsequent releases of the branch would contain no functionality > > enhancements, but just bug fixes, with the eventual aim of achieving > > 'it just works' status for any x86/x86_64 guest I try to install/run. > > I know that's a tall order, and that 0.9.0 may not be able to supply > > that for all guests. But it is an important goal to strive for. > > While I agree stability is a desirable goal, and there is obviously users > want a stable product, I'm not sure a qemu is mature enough to make a > stable branch worthwhile. Especially considering the very limited > technical resources we have available.
Limited effort is always a problem, granted. So here's a broader question, which I'm surprised nobody has asked before (afaik). Think forward to a hypothetical QEMU 1.0 release. What criteria are required for such a release? J _______________________________________________ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
