Ely Soto wrote: > Ok this is the fix I came up with. > > Basically it will check all the other objects that could potentially be > waiting for service. This will prevent one high priority object from > starving the rest. > > I'm not certain what the intention for the timeout > 0 check but this > completely prevented any wait object servicing on my machine. > > The Tap interface now works smoothly without issue.
Please resend the version for current CVS as unified diff (diff -u) without breaking the line formatting (an attachment should do). Thiemo
