Il 05/03/2012 09:53, Kevin Wolf ha scritto: >> > >> > I think we need some sort of introspection method too in order for clients >> > to >> > figure out when the command is extended. > How about coupling the types with independently available commands for > now? We would rename 'snapshot' to 'blockdev-snapshot-sync', which does > the same thing outside of transactions. The mirror patches would then > introduce a 'drive-mirror' top-level command at the same time as they > introduce a 'drive-mirror' transaction type.
Makes sense. It would also be a good excuse to port blockdev-snapshot-sync to the new fail-safe way. I'll refresh my patches if there's consensus. Paolo
