Hi,
We are planning to add PCIe SR-IOV support to the virtio-net driver for
Windows ("NetKVM")[1], and we want a SR-IOV feature for virtio-net
emulation code in QEMU to test it. I expect there are other people
interested in such a feature, considering that people are using igb[2]
to test SR-IOV support in VMs.
Washizu Yui have already proposed an RFC patch to add a SR-IOV feature
to virtio-net emulation[3][4] but it's preliminary and has no
configurability for VFs.
Now I'm proposing to add SR-IOV support to virtio-net with full
configurability for VFs by following the implementation of virtio-net
failover[5]. I'm planning to write patches myself, but I know there are
people interested in such patches so I'd like to let you know the idea
beforehand.
The idea:
The problem when implementing configurability for VFs is that SR-IOV VFs
can be realized and unrealized at runtime with a request from the guest.
So a naive implementation cannot deal with a command line like the
following:
-device virtio-net-pci,addr=0x0.0x0,sriov=on
-device virtio-net-pci,addr=0x0.0x1
-device virtio-net-pci,addr=0x0.0x2
This will realize the virtio-net functions in 0x0.0x1 and 0x0.0x2 when
the guest starts instead of when the guest requests to enable VFs.
However, reviewing the virtio-net emulation code, I realized the
virtio-net failover also "hides" devices when the guest starts. The
following command line hides hostdev0 when the guest starts, and adds it
when the guest requests VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature:
-device virtio-net-pci,netdev=hostnet1,id=net1,mac=52:54:00:6f:55:cc, \
bus=root2,failover=on
-device vfiopci,host=5e:00.2,id=hostdev0,bus=root1,failover_pair_id=net1
So it should be also possible to do similar to "hide" VFs and
realize/unrealize them when the guest requests.
There are two things I hate with this idea when contrasting it with the
conventional multifunction feature[6] though. One is that the PF must be
added before VFs; a similar limitation is imposed for failover.
Another is that it will be specific to virtio-net. I was considering to
implement a "generic" SR-IOV feature that will work on various devices,
but I realized that will need lots of configuration validations. We may
eventually want it, but probably it's better to avoid such a big leap as
the first step.
Please tell me if you have questions or suggestions.
Regards,
Akihiko Odaki
[1] https://github.com/virtio-win/kvm-guest-drivers-windows
[2] https://qemu.readthedocs.io/en/v8.1.0/system/devices/igb.html
[3]
https://patchew.org/QEMU/1689731808-3009-1-git-send-email-yui.wash...@gmail.com/
[4]
https://netdevconf.info/0x17/sessions/talk/unleashing-sr-iov-offload-on-virtual-machines.html
[5] https://qemu.readthedocs.io/en/v8.1.0/system/virtio-net-failover.html
[6] https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/blob/v8.1.2/docs/pcie.txt
