Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com> writes: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 08:43:01PM +0000, Het Gala wrote: >> migrate_uri_parse() allocates memory to 'channel' if the user >> opts for old syntax - uri, which is leaked because there is no >> code for freeing 'channel'. >> So, free channel to avoid memory leak in case where 'channels' >> is empty and uri parsing is required. >> >> Fixes: 5994024f ("migration: Implement MigrateChannelList to qmp migration >> flow") >> Signed-off-by: Het Gala <het.g...@nutanix.com> >> Suggested-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> > > Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com> > >> @@ -533,18 +533,18 @@ static void qemu_start_incoming_migration(const char >> *uri, bool has_channels, >> error_setg(errp, "Channel list has more than one entries"); >> return; >> } >> - channel = channels->value; >> + addr = channels->value->addr; >> } else if (uri) { >> /* caller uses the old URI syntax */ >> if (!migrate_uri_parse(uri, &channel, errp)) { >> return; >> } >> + addr = channel->addr; >> } else { >> error_setg(errp, "neither 'uri' or 'channels' argument are " >> "specified in 'migrate-incoming' qmp command "); >> return; >> } >> - addr = channel->addr; > > Why these "addr" lines need change? Won't that behave the same as before?
In the first case, @channel is now null. If we left the assignment to @addr alone, it would crash. Clearer now?