On 2012-03-11 08:04, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> ISA bus only use IRQ 0~15, so don't need to give an array qemu_irq 0~23, just
> array qemu_irq i8259 is ok.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <l...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> hw/pc_piix.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/pc_piix.c b/hw/pc_piix.c
> index 63dba4e..52f7cf8 100644
> --- a/hw/pc_piix.c
> +++ b/hw/pc_piix.c
> @@ -210,7 +210,6 @@ static void pc_init1(MemoryRegion *system_memory,
> isa_bus = isa_bus_new(NULL, system_io);
> no_hpet = 1;
> }
> - isa_bus_irqs(isa_bus, gsi);
>
> if (kvm_irqchip_in_kernel()) {
> i8259 = kvm_i8259_init(isa_bus);
> @@ -221,6 +220,8 @@ static void pc_init1(MemoryRegion *system_memory,
> i8259 = i8259_init(isa_bus, cpu_irq[0]);
> }
>
> + isa_bus_irqs(isa_bus, i8259);
> +
> for (i = 0; i < ISA_NUM_IRQS; i++) {
> gsi_state->i8259_irq[i] = i8259[i];
> }This is bogus. isa_bus_irqs sets the output IRQs of the ISA bus. And those are not only delivered to the PIC on the PIIX2, but also the IOAPIC. Thus we have to pass in the GSI input lines which dispatch to both. Of those lines, only the first 16 will be used by the ISA bus (there is even an assert to ensure this). Did you see any concrete bug in the context of this logic? Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
