Hi, Thomas, On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 08:21:53AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote: > Sorry for that :-(
Not at all! I actually appreciate more people looking after it. > Maybe it's better if we remove the migration-test from > the qtest section in MAINTAINERS? Since the migration test is very well > maintained already, there's IMHO no need for picking up the patches via the > qtest tree, so something like this should prevent these problems: > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -3269,6 +3269,7 @@ F: tests/qtest/ > F: docs/devel/qgraph.rst > F: docs/devel/qtest.rst > X: tests/qtest/bios-tables-test* > +X: tests/qtest/migration-* > > Device Fuzzing > M: Alexander Bulekov <alx...@bu.edu> > > (as you can see, we're doing it in a similar way for the bios tables test > already) > > If you agree, I can send out a proper patch for this later today. Currently the file is covered by both groups of people, which is the best condition to me: $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f tests/qtest/migration-test.c Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com> (maintainer:Migration) Fabiano Rosas <faro...@suse.de> (maintainer:Migration) Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> (maintainer:qtest) Laurent Vivier <lviv...@redhat.com> (maintainer:qtest) Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> (reviewer:qtest) qemu-devel@nongnu.org (open list:All patches CC here) It makes sense to me e.g. when qtest reworks the framework, and we'd like migration-test.c to be covered in that same reworks series and reviewed/pulled together, for example, then those can go via qtest's tree directly. If patch submitter follows the MAINTAINERS file it means all of us will be in the loop and that's the perfect condition, IMHO. It's just that this patch didn't have any migration people copied, which caused a very slight confusion. It'll be great in that case if qtest maintainers can help submitters to copy us if the submitters forgot to do so. I think we should do the same when there's major changes for qtest framework for a new migration test. Would that work the best for us? Thanks, -- Peter Xu
