On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 02:07:34PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 05:07:35PM +0000, Rob Bradford wrote:
> > Add the infrastructure for the 'B' extension which is the union of the
> > Zba, Zbb and Zbs instructions.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <rbradf...@rivosinc.com>
> > ---
> >  target/riscv/cpu.c         | 5 +++--
> >  target/riscv/cpu.h         | 1 +
> >  target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c | 1 +
> >  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > index b07a76ef6b..22f8e527ff 100644
> > --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > @@ -38,9 +38,9 @@
> >  #include "tcg/tcg.h"
> >  
> >  /* RISC-V CPU definitions */
> > -static const char riscv_single_letter_exts[] = "IEMAFDQCPVH";
> > +static const char riscv_single_letter_exts[] = "IEMAFDQCBPVH";
> 
> Is there a corresponding proposed change to table 29.1 of the nonpriv spec
> which states B comes after C and before P? If so, can you provide a link
> to it? Otherwise, how do we know that?

Oh, I see. The unpriv spec B chapter comes after the C chapter (and before
J, P, ...). I still wonder if we'll have a 29.1 table update with the
ratification of this extension though.

Thanks,
drew

Reply via email to