On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 1:43 AM Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> wrote: > > Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> writes: > > > From: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.od...@daynix.com> > > > > It is initialized with a simple assignment and there is little room for > > error. In fact, the validation is even more complex. > > > > Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.od...@daynix.com> > > Acked-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_...@linux.alibaba.com> > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarb...@ventanamicro.com> > > Acked-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@wdc.com> > > Message-Id: <20231213-riscv-v7-2-a760156a3...@daynix.com> > > Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> > > ping: along with this are the RiscV maintainers happy for me to take: > > [PATCH v2 23/43] target/riscv: Remove misa_mxl validation > [PATCH v2 24/43] target/riscv: Move misa_mxl_max to class > [PATCH v2 25/43] target/riscv: Validate misa_mxl_max only once > > through my next pull request?
Yep! Go for it Alistair > > <snip> > > -- > Alex Bennée > Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro >
