RE: [RFC 4/7] virtio-iommu: Implement PCIIOMMUOps set_host_resv_regions

[Duan, Zhenzhong]

Hi Eric,

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>
>Subject: [RFC 4/7] virtio-iommu: Implement PCIIOMMUOps
>set_host_resv_regions
>
>Reuse the implementation of virtio_iommu_set_iova_ranges() which
>will be removed in subsequent patches.
>
>Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>
>---
> hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>-
> 1 file changed, 101 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c
>index 8a4bd933c6..716a3fcfbf 100644
>--- a/hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c
>+++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c
>@@ -461,8 +461,109 @@ static AddressSpace
>*virtio_iommu_find_add_as(PCIBus *bus, void *opaque,
>     return &sdev->as;
> }
>
>+/**
>+ * rebuild_resv_regions: rebuild resv regions with both the
>+ * info of host resv ranges and property set resv ranges
>+ */
>+static int rebuild_resv_regions(IOMMUDevice *sdev)
>+{
>+    GList *l;
>+    int i = 0;
>+
>+    /* free the existing list and rebuild it from scratch */
>+    g_list_free_full(sdev->resv_regions, g_free);
>+    sdev->resv_regions = NULL;
>+
>+    /* First add host reserved regions if any, all tagged as RESERVED */
>+    for (l = sdev->host_resv_ranges; l; l = l->next) {
>+        ReservedRegion *reg = g_new0(ReservedRegion, 1);
>+        Range *r = (Range *)l->data;
>+
>+        reg->type = VIRTIO_IOMMU_RESV_MEM_T_RESERVED;
>+        range_set_bounds(&reg->range, range_lob(r), range_upb(r));
>+        sdev->resv_regions = resv_region_list_insert(sdev->resv_regions, reg);
>+        trace_virtio_iommu_host_resv_regions(sdev-
>>iommu_mr.parent_obj.name, i,
>+                                             range_lob(&reg->range),
>+                                             range_upb(&reg->range));
>+        i++;
>+    }
>+    /*
>+     * then add higher priority reserved regions set by the machine
>+     * through properties
>+     */
>+    add_prop_resv_regions(sdev);
>+    return 0;
>+}
>+
>+static int virtio_iommu_set_host_iova_ranges(PCIBus *bus, void *opaque,
>+                                             int devfn, GList *iova_ranges,
>+                                             Error **errp)
>+{
>+    VirtIOIOMMU *s = opaque;
>+    IOMMUPciBus *sbus = g_hash_table_lookup(s->as_by_busptr, bus);
>+    IOMMUDevice *sdev;
>+    GList *current_ranges;
>+    GList *l, *tmp, *new_ranges = NULL;
>+    int ret = -EINVAL;
>+
>+    if (!sbus) {
>+        error_report("%s no sbus", __func__);
>+    }

Do we plan to support multiple devices in same iommu group?
as_by_busptr is hashed by bus which is an aliased bus of the device.
So sbus may be NULL if device's bus is different from aliased bus.

>+
>+    sdev = sbus->pbdev[devfn];
>+
>+    current_ranges = sdev->host_resv_ranges;
>+
>+    warn_report("%s: host_resv_regions=%d", __func__, !!sdev-
>>host_resv_ranges);
>+    /* check that each new resv region is included in an existing one */
>+    if (sdev->host_resv_ranges) {

May be we could just error out as vfio_realize should not call
set_host_iova_ranges() twice.

Thanks
Zhenzhong
>+        range_inverse_array(iova_ranges,
>+                            &new_ranges,
>+                            0, UINT64_MAX);
>+
>+        for (tmp = new_ranges; tmp; tmp = tmp->next) {
>+            Range *newr = (Range *)tmp->data;
>+            bool included = false;
>+
>+            for (l = current_ranges; l; l = l->next) {
>+                Range * r = (Range *)l->data;
>+
>+                if (range_contains_range(r, newr)) {
>+                    included = true;
>+                    break;
>+                }
>+            }
>+            if (!included) {
>+                goto error;
>+            }
>+        }
>+        /* all new reserved ranges are included in existing ones */
>+        ret = 0;
>+        goto out;
>+    }
>+
>+    if (sdev->probe_done) {
>+        warn_report("%s: Notified about new host reserved regions after
>probe",
>+                    __func__);
>+    }
>+
>+    range_inverse_array(iova_ranges,
>+                        &sdev->host_resv_ranges,
>+                        0, UINT64_MAX);
>+    rebuild_resv_regions(sdev);
>+
>+    return 0;
>+error:
>+    error_setg(errp, "%s Conflicting host reserved ranges set!",
>+               __func__);
>+out:
>+    g_list_free_full(new_ranges, g_free);
>+    return ret;
>+}
>+
> static const PCIIOMMUOps virtio_iommu_ops = {
>     .get_address_space = virtio_iommu_find_add_as,
>+    .set_host_iova_ranges = virtio_iommu_set_host_iova_ranges,
> };
>
> static int virtio_iommu_attach(VirtIOIOMMU *s,
>@@ -1158,39 +1259,6 @@ static int
>virtio_iommu_set_page_size_mask(IOMMUMemoryRegion *mr,
>     return 0;
> }
>
>-/**
>- * rebuild_resv_regions: rebuild resv regions with both the
>- * info of host resv ranges and property set resv ranges
>- */
>-static int rebuild_resv_regions(IOMMUDevice *sdev)
>-{
>-    GList *l;
>-    int i = 0;
>-
>-    /* free the existing list and rebuild it from scratch */
>-    g_list_free_full(sdev->resv_regions, g_free);
>-    sdev->resv_regions = NULL;
>-
>-    /* First add host reserved regions if any, all tagged as RESERVED */
>-    for (l = sdev->host_resv_ranges; l; l = l->next) {
>-        ReservedRegion *reg = g_new0(ReservedRegion, 1);
>-        Range *r = (Range *)l->data;
>-
>-        reg->type = VIRTIO_IOMMU_RESV_MEM_T_RESERVED;
>-        range_set_bounds(&reg->range, range_lob(r), range_upb(r));
>-        sdev->resv_regions = resv_region_list_insert(sdev->resv_regions, reg);
>-        trace_virtio_iommu_host_resv_regions(sdev-
>>iommu_mr.parent_obj.name, i,
>-                                             range_lob(&reg->range),
>-                                             range_upb(&reg->range));
>-        i++;
>-    }
>-    /*
>-     * then add higher priority reserved regions set by the machine
>-     * through properties
>-     */
>-    add_prop_resv_regions(sdev);
>-    return 0;
>-}
>
> /**
>  * virtio_iommu_set_iova_ranges: Conveys the usable IOVA ranges
>--
>2.41.0