On 1/26/2024 9:57 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
uint8_t memory_region_get_dirty_log_mask(MemoryRegion *mr)
{
uint8_t mask = mr->dirty_log_mask;
diff --git a/system/physmem.c b/system/physmem.c
index c1b22bac77c2..4735b0462ed9 100644
--- a/system/physmem.c
+++ b/system/physmem.c
@@ -1841,6 +1841,17 @@ static void ram_block_add(RAMBlock *new_block,
Error **errp)
}
}
+ if (kvm_enabled() && (new_block->flags & RAM_GUEST_MEMFD) &&
+ new_block->guest_memfd < 0) {
How could we have a guest_memfd already at this point? Smells more like
an assert(new_block->guest_memfd < 0);
you are right. I will change it to the assert()
+ /* TODO: to decide if KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_ALLOW_HUGEPAGE is
supported */
I suggest dropping that completely. As long as it's not upstream, not
even the name of that thing is stable.
OK
+ new_block->guest_memfd =
kvm_create_guest_memfd(new_block->max_length,
+ 0, errp);
+ if (new_block->guest_memfd < 0) {
+ qemu_mutex_unlock_ramlist();
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+
In general, LGTM. With the two nits above:
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
Thanks!
