Il 13/03/2012 13:13, Andreas Färber ha scritto: > > It will be easier to generalize later qdev code and not make special > > case when adding cpus. > > I never heard anyone wanting to generalize reset so far. I don't think > it belongs into Object at least. Maybe DeviceState. Anthony? Paolo?
I believe long term we want CPUs to become a DeviceState. For now, I think Andreas's prototype is fine. Methods should not take a superclass argument in general. > This series is taking much too long to move forward (the QOM "steam" > seems to be gone?) and I'm worried that introducing much more basic > infrastructure will make review and applying even slower, cf. > object_class_foreach_ordered()/_get_list(). Agreed, this series looks more or less good (and mostly mechanical anyway). Is it an RFC or what? :) I wonder if reviewers are put off by the subject. Paolo
