On 30/1/24 12:05, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 1/30/24 18:26, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
What is the rationale here? (I'm trying to generically understand
in which case one is better than another).
Didn't you ask Anton why a generic cpu_* function was using CPUArchState?
Anyway, I think we've generally used CPUState more often with generic
functions, and this should follow.
Yes I concur. I thought maybe you figured another benefit I
didn't noticed yet, that would be useful to document elsewhere.
