On 03/13/2012 11:58 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> +static void cpu_register(const ARMCPUInfo *info)
>>> +{
>>> + TypeInfo type = {
>>> + .name = info->name,>> >> Are non-initialized members guaranteed to be zero here? > > I thought so for the C99-style struct initialization... I never ran into > crashes while testing. Do we need static to be safe? Yes, C99 guarantees in 6.7.8 p19: The initialization shall occur in initializer list order, each initializer provided for a particular subobject overriding any previously listed initializer for the same subobject; all subobjects that are not initialized explicitly shall be initialized implicitly the same as objects that have static storage duration. -- Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
