On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 4:54 PM David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Memory regions cannot overlap, and if we ever hit that case something
> would be really flawed.
>
> For example, when vhost code in QEMU decides to increase the size of memory
> regions to cover full huge pages, it makes sure to never create overlaps,
> and if there would be overlaps, it would bail out.
>
> QEMU commits 48d7c9757749 ("vhost: Merge sections added to temporary
> list"), c1ece84e7c93 ("vhost: Huge page align and merge") and
> e7b94a84b6cb ("vhost: Allow adjoining regions") added and clarified that
> handling and how overlaps are impossible.
>
> Consequently, each GPA can belong to at most one memory region, and
> everything else doesn't make sense. Let's factor out our search to prepare
> for further changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Raphael Norwitz <raph...@enfabrica.net>

> ---
>  subprojects/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c | 79 +++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/subprojects/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c 
> b/subprojects/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c
> index 22154b217f..d036b54ed0 100644
> --- a/subprojects/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c
> +++ b/subprojects/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c
> @@ -195,30 +195,47 @@ vu_panic(VuDev *dev, const char *msg, ...)
>       */
>  }
>
> +/* Search for a memory region that covers this guest physical address. */
> +static VuDevRegion *
> +vu_gpa_to_mem_region(VuDev *dev, uint64_t guest_addr)
> +{
> +    unsigned int i;
> +
> +    /*
> +     * Memory regions cannot overlap in guest physical address space. Each
> +     * GPA belongs to exactly one memory region, so there can only be one
> +     * match.
> +     */
> +    for (i = 0; i < dev->nregions; i++) {
> +        VuDevRegion *cur = &dev->regions[i];
> +
> +        if (guest_addr >= cur->gpa && guest_addr < cur->gpa + cur->size) {
> +            return cur;
> +        }
> +    }
> +    return NULL;
> +}
> +
>  /* Translate guest physical address to our virtual address.  */
>  void *
>  vu_gpa_to_va(VuDev *dev, uint64_t *plen, uint64_t guest_addr)
>  {
> -    unsigned int i;
> +    VuDevRegion *r;
>
>      if (*plen == 0) {
>          return NULL;
>      }
>
> -    /* Find matching memory region.  */
> -    for (i = 0; i < dev->nregions; i++) {
> -        VuDevRegion *r = &dev->regions[i];
> -
> -        if ((guest_addr >= r->gpa) && (guest_addr < (r->gpa + r->size))) {
> -            if ((guest_addr + *plen) > (r->gpa + r->size)) {
> -                *plen = r->gpa + r->size - guest_addr;
> -            }
> -            return (void *)(uintptr_t)
> -                guest_addr - r->gpa + r->mmap_addr + r->mmap_offset;
> -        }
> +    r = vu_gpa_to_mem_region(dev, guest_addr);
> +    if (!r) {
> +        return NULL;
>      }
>
> -    return NULL;
> +    if ((guest_addr + *plen) > (r->gpa + r->size)) {
> +        *plen = r->gpa + r->size - guest_addr;
> +    }
> +    return (void *)(uintptr_t)guest_addr - r->gpa + r->mmap_addr +
> +           r->mmap_offset;
>  }
>
>  /* Translate qemu virtual address to our virtual address.  */
> @@ -854,8 +871,8 @@ static inline bool reg_equal(VuDevRegion *vudev_reg,
>  static bool
>  vu_rem_mem_reg(VuDev *dev, VhostUserMsg *vmsg) {
>      VhostUserMemoryRegion m = vmsg->payload.memreg.region, *msg_region = &m;
> -    unsigned int i;
> -    bool found = false;
> +    unsigned int idx;
> +    VuDevRegion *r;
>
>      if (vmsg->fd_num > 1) {
>          vmsg_close_fds(vmsg);
> @@ -882,28 +899,22 @@ vu_rem_mem_reg(VuDev *dev, VhostUserMsg *vmsg) {
>      DPRINT("    mmap_offset      0x%016"PRIx64"\n",
>             msg_region->mmap_offset);
>
> -    for (i = 0; i < dev->nregions; i++) {
> -        if (reg_equal(&dev->regions[i], msg_region)) {
> -            VuDevRegion *r = &dev->regions[i];
> -
> -            munmap((void *)(uintptr_t)r->mmap_addr, r->size + 
> r->mmap_offset);
> -
> -            /* Shift all affected entries by 1 to close the hole at index. */
> -            memmove(dev->regions + i, dev->regions + i + 1,
> -                    sizeof(VuDevRegion) * (dev->nregions - i - 1));
> -            DPRINT("Successfully removed a region\n");
> -            dev->nregions--;
> -            i--;
> -
> -            found = true;
> -            break;
> -        }
> -    }
> -
> -    if (!found) {
> +    r = vu_gpa_to_mem_region(dev, msg_region->guest_phys_addr);
> +    if (!r || !reg_equal(r, msg_region)) {
> +        vmsg_close_fds(vmsg);
>          vu_panic(dev, "Specified region not found\n");
> +        return false;
>      }
>
> +    munmap((void *)(uintptr_t)r->mmap_addr, r->size + r->mmap_offset);
> +
> +    idx = r - dev->regions;
> +    assert(idx < dev->nregions);
> +    /* Shift all affected entries by 1 to close the hole. */
> +    memmove(r, r + 1, sizeof(VuDevRegion) * (dev->nregions - idx - 1));
> +    DPRINT("Successfully removed a region\n");
> +    dev->nregions--;
> +
>      vmsg_close_fds(vmsg);
>
>      return false;
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>

Reply via email to