On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 06:45:23PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote: > On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 10:22:35AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 11:25:13AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 10:47:05AM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote: > > > > Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 03:04, <pet...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> From: Fabiano Rosas <faro...@suse.de> > > > > >> > > > > >> The migration tests have support for being passed two QEMU binaries > > > > >> to > > > > >> test migration compatibility. > > > > >> > > > > >> Add a CI job that builds the lastest release of QEMU and another job > > > > >> that uses that version plus an already present build of the current > > > > >> version and run the migration tests with the two, both as source and > > > > >> destination. I.e.: > > > > >> > > > > >> old QEMU (n-1) -> current QEMU (development tree) > > > > >> current QEMU (development tree) -> old QEMU (n-1) > > > > >> > > > > >> The purpose of this CI job is to ensure the code we're about to merge > > > > >> will not cause a migration compatibility problem when migrating the > > > > >> next release (which will contain that code) to/from the previous > > > > >> release. > > > > >> > > > > >> The version of migration-test used will be the one matching the older > > > > >> QEMU. That way we can avoid special-casing new tests that wouldn't be > > > > >> compatible with the older QEMU. > > > > >> > > > > >> Note: for user forks, the version tags need to be pushed to gitlab > > > > >> otherwise it won't be able to checkout a different version. > > > > >> > > > > >> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <faro...@suse.de> > > > > >> Link: > > > > >> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240118164951.30350-3-faro...@suse.de > > > > >> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com> > > > > >> --- > > > > >> .gitlab-ci.d/buildtest.yml | 60 > > > > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > >> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+) > > > > >> > > > > >> diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.d/buildtest.yml b/.gitlab-ci.d/buildtest.yml > > > > >> index e1c7801598..f0b0edc634 100644 > > > > >> --- a/.gitlab-ci.d/buildtest.yml > > > > >> +++ b/.gitlab-ci.d/buildtest.yml > > > > >> @@ -167,6 +167,66 @@ build-system-centos: > > > > >> x86_64-softmmu rx-softmmu sh4-softmmu nios2-softmmu > > > > >> MAKE_CHECK_ARGS: check-build > > > > >> > > > > >> +# Previous QEMU release. Used for cross-version migration tests. > > > > >> +build-previous-qemu: > > > > >> + extends: .native_build_job_template > > > > >> + artifacts: > > > > >> + when: on_success > > > > >> + expire_in: 2 days > > > > >> + paths: > > > > >> + - build-previous > > > > >> + exclude: > > > > >> + - build-previous/**/*.p > > > > >> + - build-previous/**/*.a.p > > > > >> + - build-previous/**/*.fa.p > > > > >> + - build-previous/**/*.c.o > > > > >> + - build-previous/**/*.c.o.d > > > > >> + - build-previous/**/*.fa > > > > >> + needs: > > > > >> + job: amd64-opensuse-leap-container > > > > >> + variables: > > > > >> + IMAGE: opensuse-leap > > > > >> + TARGETS: x86_64-softmmu aarch64-softmmu > > > > >> + before_script: > > > > >> + - export QEMU_PREV_VERSION="$(sed > > > > >> 's/\([0-9.]*\)\.[0-9]*/v\1.0/' VERSION)" > > > > >> + - git checkout $QEMU_PREV_VERSION > > > > >> + after_script: > > > > >> + - mv build build-previous > > > > > > > > > > There seems to be a problem with this new CI job. Running a CI > > > > > run in my local repository it fails: > > > > > > > > > > https://gitlab.com/pm215/qemu/-/jobs/6075873685 > > > > > > > > > > $ export QEMU_PREV_VERSION="$(sed 's/\([0-9.]*\)\.[0-9]*/v .0/' > > > > > VERSION)" > > > > > $ git checkout $QEMU_PREV_VERSION > > > > > error: pathspec 'v8.2.0' did not match any file(s) known to git > > > > > Running after_script > > > > > Running after script... > > > > > $ mv build build-previous > > > > > mv: cannot stat 'build': No such file or directory > > > > > WARNING: after_script failed, but job will continue unaffected: exit > > > > > code 1 > > > > > Saving cache for failed job > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't think you can assume that private forks doing submaintainer CI > > > > > runs necessarily have the full set of tags that the main repo does. > > > > > > > > Yes, I thought this would be rare enough not to be an issue, but it > > > > seems it's not. I don't know what could be done here, if there's no tag, > > > > then there's no way to resolve the actual commit hash I think. > > > > > > > > > I suspect the sed run will also do the wrong thing when run on the > > > > > commit that updates the version, because then it will replace > > > > > "9.0.0" with "9.0.0". > > > > > > > > I just ignored this completly because my initial idea was to leave this > > > > job disabled and only run it for migration patchsets and pull requests, > > > > so it wouldn't make sense to run at that commit. > > > > > > > > This job is also not entirely fail proof by design because we could > > > > always be hitting bugs in the older QEMU version that were already fixed > > > > in the new version. > > > > > > > > I think the simplest fix here is to leave the test disabled, possibly > > > > with an env variable to enable it. > > > > > > However if so that'll be unfortunate.. because the goal of the "n-1" test > > > is to fail the exact commit that will break compatibility and make it > > > enforced, IMHO. > > > > > > Failing for some migration guy pushing CI can be better than nothing > > > indeed, but it is just less ideal.. we want the developer / module > > > maintainer notice this issue, fix it instead of merging something wrong > > > already, then we try to find what is broken and ask for a fix (where there > > > will still be a window it's broken; and if unlucky across major releases). > > > > > > Currently the coverage of n-1 test is indeed still more focused on > > > migration framework, but it'll also cover quite some default configs of > > > the > > > system layout (even if only x86 is covered), and some default devices > > > IIRC. > > > We can already attach a few more standard devices in the cmdline so more > > > things can get covered. > > > > > > A pretty dumb (but might be working?) solution is we keep commit ID rather > > > than tags to avoid all kinds of tag hassles: > > > > > > PREVIOUS_VERSION_COMMIT_ID=1600b9f46b1bd08b00fe86c46ef6dbb48cbe10d6 > > > > > > Then we boost it after a release. I think it'll also work for the release > > > commit then. > > > > Please don't go for hardcoding stuff. AFAICS, the solution is very easy > > and only requires adding two git commands to the test job: > > > > export QEMU_PREV_VERSION="$(sed 's/\([0-9.]*\)\.[0-9]*/v\1.0/' VERSION)" > > git remote add upstream https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu > > git fetch upstream $QEMU_PRRV_VERSION > > git checkout $QEMU_PREV_VERSION > > True... I'm as stupid as I could have. :) Thanks. > > For the CI test when at exactly the commit to release QEMU: I assume it's > fine to simply run it with 9.0 <-> 9.0 for example, which is one more time > of current migration qtest. IIUC that shouldn't be a big deal.
Yes, that should be harmless, and by the time we hit the 9.0 tag, then it is too late to fix any problem with 8.2 -> 9.0 migration anyway. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|