On 2024/02/05 18:31, Alex Bennée wrote:
Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.od...@daynix.com> writes:

On 2024/02/03 22:58, Alex Bennée wrote:
Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.od...@daynix.com> writes:

On 2024/02/03 20:08, Alex Bennée wrote:
Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.od...@daynix.com> writes:

This series extracts fixes and refactorings that can be applied
independently from "[PATCH v9 00/23] plugins: Allow to read registers".

The patch "target/riscv: Move MISA limits to class" was replaced with
patch "target/riscv: Move misa_mxl_max to class" since I found instances
may have different misa_ext_mask.
As this is re-based on Alistair's riscv-to-apply.next tree I'll wait
for
this to go through the RiscV trees and then re-base the plugin patches
and dropping the merged riscv patches from my tree.
In the meantime feel free to review:
     Message-Id: <20240122145610.413836-1-alex.ben...@linaro.org>
     Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 14:55:49 +0000
     Subject: [PATCH v3 00/21] plugin updates (register access) for 9.0 
(pre-PR?)
     From: =?UTF-8?q?Alex=20Benn=C3=A9e?= <alex.ben...@linaro.org>
For:
     contrib/plugins: extend execlog to track register changes
     gdbstub: expose api to find registers
So I can add this to my maintainer omnibus series for the next PR I
send.

I added one trivial comment to: "gdbstub: expose api to find registers"

"contrib/plugins: extend execlog to track register changes" depends on
"plugins: add an API to read registers". The comments for the patch in
the following email are not addressed yet:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/4b2156ed-688d-4617-b52d-200413f01...@daynix.com/
I don't think we need to serialise with the BQL as the structures
are
per-CPU (and created on vCPU creation).

qemu_plugin_get_registers() has vcpu parameter, which can refer to a
different vcpu the caller is on (or the caller may not be in a vcpu
context at all).

It should only be called from the current cpu context. We can either
assert that or make it implicit like qemu_plugin_insn_disas does.
However we will need to ensure current_cpu is set before the vcpu_init
callback.

Then that should be documented and the vcpu_index parameter should be deleted.

Reply via email to