On 19/02/2024 09:03, Avihai Horon wrote:
> Hi Joao,
>
> On 12/02/2024 15:56, Joao Martins wrote:
>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>
>>
>> Probe hardware dirty tracking support by querying device hw capabilities
>> via IOMMUFD_GET_HW_INFO.
>>
>> In preparation to using the dirty tracking UAPI, request dirty tracking in
>> the HWPT flags when the device doesn't support dirty page tracking or has
>> it disabled; or when support when the VF backing IOMMU supports dirty
>> tracking. The latter is in the possibility of a device being attached
>> that doesn't have a dirty tracker.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.mart...@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> hw/vfio/common.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>> hw/vfio/iommufd.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h | 2 ++
>> 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/vfio/common.c b/hw/vfio/common.c
>> index f7f85160be88..d8fc7077f839 100644
>> --- a/hw/vfio/common.c
>> +++ b/hw/vfio/common.c
>> @@ -216,6 +216,24 @@ bool vfio_devices_all_device_dirty_tracking(const
>> VFIOContainerBase *bcontainer)
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> +bool vfio_device_migration_supported(VFIODevice *vbasedev)
>> +{
>> + if (!vbasedev->migration) {
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return vbasedev->migration->mig_flags & VFIO_MIGRATION_STOP_COPY;
>
> I think this is redundant, as (vbasedev->migration != NULL) implies
> (vbasedev->migration->mig_flags & VFIO_MIGRATION_STOP_COPY) == true.
>
The check was there to prevent a null-deref in case the device didn't support
migration.
>> +}
>> +
>> +bool vfio_device_dirty_pages_supported(VFIODevice *vbasedev)
>> +{
>> + if (vbasedev->pre_copy_dirty_page_tracking == ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF) {
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return !vbasedev->dirty_pages_supported;
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * Check if all VFIO devices are running and migration is active, which is
>> * essentially equivalent to the migration being in pre-copy phase.
>> diff --git a/hw/vfio/iommufd.c b/hw/vfio/iommufd.c
>> index ca7ec45e725c..edacb6d72748 100644
>> --- a/hw/vfio/iommufd.c
>> +++ b/hw/vfio/iommufd.c
>> @@ -219,11 +219,26 @@ static int iommufd_cdev_detach_ioas_hwpt(VFIODevice
>> *vbasedev, Error **errp)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +static bool iommufd_dirty_pages_supported(IOMMUFDDevice *iommufd_dev,
>> + Error **errp)
>> +{
>> + uint64_t caps;
>> + int r;
>> +
>> + r = iommufd_device_get_hw_capabilities(iommufd_dev, &caps, errp);
>> + if (r) {
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return caps & IOMMU_HW_CAP_DIRTY_TRACKING;
>
> The false return value of this function is overloaded, it can indicate both
> error and lack of DPT support.
> Should we fail iommufd_cdev_autodomains_get() if
> iommufd_dirty_pages_supported()
> fails?
Definitely not.
> Otherwise, errp argument of iommufd_dirty_pages_supported() is redundant and
> we
> can handle iommufd_device_get_hw_capabilities() error locally.
>
I'll handle locally.
>> +}
>> +
>> static int iommufd_cdev_autodomains_get(VFIODevice *vbasedev,
>> VFIOIOMMUFDContainer *container,
>> Error **errp)
>> {
>> int iommufd = vbasedev->iommufd_dev.iommufd->fd;
>> + uint32_t flags = 0;
>> VFIOIOASHwpt *hwpt;
>> Error *err = NULL;
>> int ret = -EINVAL;
>> @@ -245,9 +260,15 @@ static int iommufd_cdev_autodomains_get(VFIODevice
>> *vbasedev,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> + if ((vfio_device_migration_supported(vbasedev) &&
>> + !vfio_device_dirty_pages_supported(vbasedev)) ||
>> + iommufd_dirty_pages_supported(&vbasedev->iommufd_dev, &err)) {
>
> I think it's too early to check vfio_device_migration_supported() and
> vfio_device_dirty_pages_supported() here, as vfio_migration_init() hasn't been
> called yet so vbasedev->migration and vbasedev->dirty_pages_supported are not
> initialized.
I should replace with its own vfio device probing but the next point invalidates
this
> Why do we need to check this? Can't we simply request IOMMUFD DPT if it's
> supported?
>
There's no point in force requesting dpt in the domain if the device doesn't do
migration that was my thinking here; but otoh as past hotplug bug fixes have
shown it needs to proof against a new device getting add up that supports
migration while and the unsupported one be removed. So I guess we might not have
another option but to always ask for it if supported.
> Thanks.
>
>> + flags = IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC_DIRTY_TRACKING;
>> + }
>> +
>> ret = iommufd_backend_alloc_hwpt(iommufd,
>> vbasedev->iommufd_dev.devid,
>> - container->ioas_id, 0, 0, 0,
>> + container->ioas_id, flags, 0, 0,
>> NULL, &hwpt_id);
>> if (ret) {
>> error_append_hint(&err,
>> @@ -271,6 +292,8 @@ static int iommufd_cdev_autodomains_get(VFIODevice
>> *vbasedev,
>> vbasedev->hwpt = hwpt;
>> QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&hwpt->device_list, vbasedev, hwpt_next);
>> QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&container->hwpt_list, hwpt, next);
>> + container->bcontainer.dirty_pages_supported =
>> + (flags & IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC_DIRTY_TRACKING);
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h b/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h
>> index 7f7d823221e2..a3e691c126c6 100644
>> --- a/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h
>> +++ b/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h
>> @@ -271,6 +271,8 @@ bool
>> vfio_devices_all_running_and_mig_active(const VFIOContainerBase
>> *bcontainer);
>> bool
>> vfio_devices_all_device_dirty_tracking(const VFIOContainerBase
>> *bcontainer);
>> +bool vfio_device_migration_supported(VFIODevice *vbasedev);
>> +bool vfio_device_dirty_pages_supported(VFIODevice *vbasedev);
>> int vfio_devices_query_dirty_bitmap(const VFIOContainerBase *bcontainer,
>> VFIOBitmap *vbmap, hwaddr iova,
>> hwaddr size);
>> --
>> 2.39.3
>>
