On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 12:54, Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> wrote: > I gave it a try, but then we end up again with the problem that I already > mentioned in the discussion about patch 1: CONFIG_ARM_V7M is not set for the > linux-user binaries, so m_helper.c would not get included there anymore and > we end up with lots of link failures. > > So if you don't like the current shape, I guess this needs a little bit more > pondering 'til it gets acceptable. > > But could you maybe at least pick up the first patch already? ... since it's > a patch with lots of code movement in it, this is quite ugly to rebase it > each time someone touches some lines of code in that area...
I don't object to taking the first patch, but... it doesn't apply so it needs rebasing :-/ If you can rebase and send it out this afternoon I can put it in a pullreq I'm working on. -- PMM
