Joachim Henke wrote: > On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 10:51 +0200, Juergen Keil wrote: > > Isn't the use of "which" wrong, anyway? > > > > "which" belongs to csh/tcsh, and tells you about csh's/tcsh's idea > > about a command or a csh command alias. > > > > IMO, for a /bin/sh (or bash) script, using the "type" command would > > be a better idea. > > Yes, 'which' is not reliable.
"type" appears to be bash-specific, at least according to the bash documentation, so I stuck with "which" for now. Thiemo
