Subject: all unions are type-based. Perhaps "support implicit union tags on the wire"?
Do you need this schema language feature for folding block jobs into the jobs abstraction, or is it just for making the wire protocol nicer in places?
- [RFC 06/15] blockjob: move change action impl... Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
- [RFC 07/15] qapi: add job-change Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
- [RFC 11/15] job-qmp: job_query_single_locked:... Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
- [RFC 03/15] blockjob: block_job_change_locked... Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
- [RFC 08/15] qapi: job-change: support speed p... Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
- [RFC 12/15] qapi: rename BlockDeviceIoStatus ... Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
- [RFC 09/15] qapi: job-complete: introduce no-... Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
- [RFC 01/15] scripts/qapi: support type-based ... Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
- Re: [RFC 01/15] scripts/qapi: support ty... Markus Armbruster
- Re: [RFC 01/15] scripts/qapi: suppor... Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
- Re: [RFC 01/15] scripts/qapi: support ty... Markus Armbruster
- Re: [RFC 01/15] scripts/qapi: suppor... Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
- [RFC 05/15] qapi: JobChangeOptions: make type... Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
- [RFC 14/15] qapi: query-job: add block-job sp... Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
- [RFC 13/15] qapi: move IoStatus to common.jso... Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
