Am 02.04.2024 um 12:53 hat Philippe Mathieu-Daudé geschrieben: > On 27/3/24 20:27, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > Coverity complains that the check introduced in commit 3f934817 suggests > > that qiov could be NULL and we dereference it before reaching the check. > > In fact, all of the callers pass a non-NULL pointer, so just remove the > > misleading check. > > > > Resolves: Coverity CID 1542668 > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com> > > --- > > block/io.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Since I'm not seeing other block related patch for 9.0 and > I'm preparing a pull request, I'm queuing this one.
Thanks, Phil. I didn't send a pull request because I didn't have anything else and silencing a Coverity false positive didn't seem urgent for 9.0, but it certainly doesn't hurt either. Kevin
