On 07/03/2024 17:43, Thomas Huth wrote:
For consistency we should drop the names with a "+" in it in the
long run.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
---
docs/about/deprecated.rst | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
index 8565644da6..7058341f8f 100644
--- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst
+++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
@@ -202,6 +202,15 @@ in the QEMU object model anymore. ``power5+``,
``power5+_v2.1``,
an alias, but for consistency these will get removed in a future
release, too. Use ``power5p_v2.1`` and ``power7p_v2.1`` instead.
+``Sun-UltraSparc-IIIi+`` and ``Sun-UltraSparc-IV+`` CPU names (since 9.0)
+'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
+
+The character "+" in device (and thus also CPU) names is not allowed
+in the QEMU object model anymore. ``Sun-UltraSparc-IIIi+`` and
+``Sun-UltraSparc-IV+`` are currently still supported via a workaround,
+but for consistency these will get removed in a future release, too.
+Use ``Sun-UltraSparc-IIIip`` and ``Sun-UltraSparc-IVp`` instead.
+
CRIS CPU architecture (since 9.0)
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
See my previous comment about the CPU names, otherwise:
Reviewed-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayl...@ilande.co.uk>
ATB,
Mark.
