On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:33:21AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 03/21/2012 11:26 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >On 03/21/2012 11:11 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>Frankly I don't see value in making it visible to the user, > >>at all. We are just triggering windows reactivations > >>without any user benefit. Why not return a fixed value there > >>to avoid that? > > > >I don't see a problem making it fixed for 1.1, but for 1.0 and older, we > >should > >expose what we were supposed to expose. > > > >We need to fix the bug first, then we can change the behavior. > > In some cases, like USB, we really do want to expose a version,
why, exactly? > but > we should probably only expose the major version, for instance, QEMU > 1.x or 2.x. This would only be exposed by the appropriate machine > types. > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori > > > > >Regards, > > > >Anthony Liguori > > > >> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > > >
