On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:57:31PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote: > Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> > --- > target-unicore32/cpu.h | 2 -- > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/target-unicore32/cpu.h b/target-unicore32/cpu.h > index a3f8589..be85250 100644 > --- a/target-unicore32/cpu.h > +++ b/target-unicore32/cpu.h > @@ -134,8 +134,6 @@ int uc32_cpu_signal_handler(int host_signum, void *pinfo, > void *puc); > int uc32_cpu_handle_mmu_fault(CPUUniCore32State *env, target_ulong address, > int rw, > int mmu_idx); > > -#define CPU_SAVE_VERSION 2 > -
Would it be pretty straightforward to give this the same treatment as the cpus in #2? Would be nice to have a migration blocker registered rather than just continuing to allow users to try it hopelessly. > /* MMU modes definitions */ > #define MMU_MODE0_SUFFIX _kernel > #define MMU_MODE1_SUFFIX _user > -- > 1.7.7.6 > >